Tuesday, December 30, 2008

The Truth About Tolerence

Hello to my [two] faithful followers and to all those who pass in the night.  I know it has been some time since the last time we've met, but I have been waiting with bated breathe to see what will happen now that it seems that America has come to a bit of sense.  This post has nothing to do with the United States per se, but rather a more global interest.  
What it is that I speak of is this false concept of religious tolerance; and more specifically, that all religions are the same... they are not.  With the recent attacks on Israel by the Hamas cowards a question that has been plaguing me for years has again reared its nagging head.  If Muslims believe that their religion is a peaceful one, and that theirs is a religion of "tolerance," why then do these attacks not enrage then into some more tangible action other than verbal condemnation?  Oh, it is easy to say that it is wrong to fire rockets into civilian masses, and to state that these atrocities are committed by a fanatical fringe element.  It is completely another to actually do something about it.  When I say "do Something," I do not mean boo-hooing about the terrible tragedy, or even the ridiculous position that Israel should turn the proverbial cheek and seek to broker some peace accord that Hamas will simply break again.  But rather, meaningful action by the only group actual capable of affecting real change... the Muslim community itself.
The Muslims of the world have for far too long did nothing other than flap their lips in useless diatribe about how they do not support these terrorist groups who claim to be doing Allah's work.  It is high time for the "average" Muslim to start a "Jihad" of their own against their erstwhile brothers-in-arms, and actually take the battle for peace to them themselves.  Only then will this madness end when these fringe groups no longer enjoy the tacit complacency of their own peers.  Until the Muslim community take up arms against these prodigal sons, can they claim to be the equals of those whom are targeted by them.
I therefore say it is time for religious intolerance! no longer can the rest of the world (the civilized world) tolerate Muslim apathy!  

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Joe the Plumber for President

Anyone who has been following the '08 Presidential Election, knows the hot buzz-word is "change."  All we hear about these days is change, in fact McCain's campaign slogan is "Change is coming." Then there's this Obama character who swears that he represents the change the nation needs.  However, after tonight's debate between these two traditional Presidential candidates, I know what change this country really needs... I'm voting for Joe the Plumber!
That's right, I am voting for this Joe the Plumber guy.  After all, wasn't he referred to at least 21 times in total by both these so-called front runners.  McCain deferred to Joe on nearly every question he was asked.  Not to mention that if John McCain says this guy is rich, with all the dough that McCain has, this Joe guy must be rolling in the cheddar.  That means he must understand the economy better than anyone else.  Joe the Plumber's name was mentioned with every major issue concerning this election, from the failing economy to war, so he must have all the answers too.  Why should we waist our votes on either one of these two chumps, when our Saviour is right in front of us.  It's Joe the Plumber or bust for me!
Now, with the revelation of Joe the Plumber's clear superiority over both the mainstream candidates there are several questions we Americans must have answered.  First, what party affiliation does Joe side with?  Or perhaps he is an independent.  What would this new party's symbol be; we already know of the Democrat's donkey, and the GOP's elephant.  Maybe it is the plumber's ass-crack.  Second, who is Joe the Plumber's Vice-Presidential running mate?  The word on that proverbial street is that he has chosen Joe Six-pack.  If this rumour is correct, then it would be devastating to McCain's bid for the White House, since his VP candidate Sarah Palin was depending heavily on the Joe Six-pack faction vote! 

The next President of the United States of America: Joe the Plumber

One possible symbol of the new Two Joe's Party

So I say to all you red-blooded Americans out there, vote for the Two Joes for a better to-morrow!

Sunday, October 12, 2008

George W. Bush and Saddam Hussein Exactly the Same

After watching a recent PBS documentary on the Hussein trial and execution, I have come to the opinion that both men are exactly the same.  When I say exactly the same, I truly mean the same; not metaphorically speaking, but in an absolute factual sense!  Most Americans call Saddam an evil corrupt dictator, I say that President Bush is no different.  There may be some of you that read this blog and think that there is no way that a person in their right mind could possibly make such an outlandish statement, but I say at least listen to the following argument before passing judgment:
First, both Saddam Hussein and George Bush are (or were) in fact dictators.  Saddam came to power by means of a coup and then confirmed by subsequent various dubious elections, so did George W. Bush.  Neither individual were democratically elected, and immediately moved to silence any dissent raised by their opposition.  Remember, Al Gore actually received the majority popular vote http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/; Bush was elected by the Electoral College, in fact, there was some serious question whether he actually carried the Florida vote (where his brother John Ellis "Jeb" Bush was Governor).  No one would argue that Saddam's elections were "fair" elections either, but at least he didn't put anyone else's name on Iraq's ballots; in turn, there was never any illusion of genuine propriety created by them.  Therefore, both nations leaders came to office under  false pretenses.
Second, both Bush and Hussein engaged in unprovoked wars to fulfil personal agendas.  We Americans have all heard the horror stories of Iraqi war crimes and genocide.  There are several facts about these Iraqi wars that most Americans are either ignorant to, or simply refuse to acknowledge.  The first of these facts is that the United States not only encouraged Iraq to invade Iran, but we supplied Iraq with both intelligence and war materials during the entire conflict.  It is a fact that the US supplied materials necessary to produce chemical weapons which were ruthlessly (and effectively) used against the ill-prepared Iranian army.  So whenever you think that it was necessary to invade Iraq to rid Saddam of his "weapons of mass destruction," just remember that the US would have given him any WMDs he might have had (if in fact he still had any of them left).  Second, the 1990 invasion into Kuwait was given tacit approval (or at least there wasn't any overt opposition) by the US government PRIOR to the actual invasion.  It was only some time after the invasion, that the US registered any disapproval in Saddam's actions.  After all, Iraq was actual considered an ally at the time!  One fact that most Americans fail to comprehend is that Kuwait was actually a province of Iraq and was carved out of Iraq by the English who, at the time, controlled the region.
Similarly, George W. Bush invaded Iraq without any legitimate reason.  Iraq was never involved with the 9/11 attack, nor were they in possession of any WMDs.  Thousands of Iraqi soldiers died for no other reason than defending their own country from the invasion of a foreign power (the United States of America).  In fact it is my not-so-humble opinion, George Bush should be brought before the Hague, and charged with war crimes.  These newly formed military tribunals should be charging Bush with treason and genocide.  This "personal" war of Bush is costing this great nation 10 billion dollars a month and much more in the lives of our brave soldiers.
Finally, though not as so important as the first two examples, is the fact that both individuals routinely "cleaned house" of all those that opposed them within their respective governments.  Although Saddam's chosen method was considerably more violent (typically by means of execution), it makes little practical difference in the inevitable outcome.  Let us not forget the recent Federal prosecutors dismissal scandal.  President Bush simply fired any prosecutor that did not agree with his narrow political views.  Admittedly, none of the fired prosecutors lost their lives, they did lose their positions and thus effectively eliminated them.  Not to mention the ruthless way that the Bush/Cheney administration attacked anyone that questioned their policies.  How many Americans were branded as "traitors" and unpatriotic by this administration.  There is also some debate as to exactly how many Americans have had their Constitutional Rights violated under the guise of "homeland security."  In fact this very blog and the computer you are using to view it, could at this very moment, be on some DHS agents screen being scrutinized for threats to the United States.  This is not the America the Founding Father intended.
If President Clinton can be impeached for not wanting to disclose his "personal" sex life, why can't George W. Bush be impeached for prosecuting an illegal war of aggression?  So you see, there is no significant difference between the two "dictators."  For those of you out there that would call me a traitor, I served my country in the Armed Forces... did you?
 

Friday, October 10, 2008

McCain Finally Admits That the Economy May Be In Trouble

Today Sen. John McCain reluctantly conceded that Wall Street and the nation's economy in general, may be in trouble.  It was reported that McCain agreed that he might have to take a closer look into this "economy thing" as the Dow Jones hits a new all time low of 12; the market has lost a staggering 99.92% of its total value over the past three weeks- a mind-numbing total loss of 11,202 points.  Palin is quoted as saying, "Golly, I may be Just a 'hockey-mom' but I think it's a really gosh-darn bad idea building walls in the middle of a street."
It has also been confirmed that President Bush has announced that he will invade Israel in order to fix the slumping US economy.  He was quoted today as saying, "It only makes sense right... everybody knows them Jews got all the money?"
In other news, fast-food giant McDonald's has announced that they are replacing their famous "Dollar Menu," with their new "Fifty-dollar Menu!"  A spokesperson for the company sites inflation and the dropping US dollar for the move.
 

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Maverick Spirit

We Americans have all heard about John McCain and Sarah Palin's "maverick spirit." But, many of you may be as confused as to what exactly that term means.  So let us take a look at what the "maverick spirit" is:
In my investigations I have attempted to determine which definition best fits the McCain/Palin ticket.  I used both the Internet and Webster's dictionary in this endeavor, and I confident that I have conclusively determined what this elusive moniker really means.  
First, the most obvious and ironically the most misused interpretation: A person who thinks independently; A non-conformist, or rebel.  Well I am absolutely sure that this is the definition that the McCain/Palin handlers hope the average ill-informed American voter would associate with the ticket.  But, even the most cursory investigation into the two candidates reveals that neither are independent thinkers, nor non-conformists.  McCain is as "old-boyish" as they come, and Palin... well, she is whatever she is- but rebel she is not!  In fact, Palin represents a giant step backwards for women equality.  It could be argued that Palin is the "poster-child" for every male chauvinist who preach that women are not capable of doing "a mans job" (way to go Sarah). 
The second possibility is that either one or both are wild unbranded range animals (especially a motherless calf).  Now I am not exactly sure about either candidates' childhood family dynamic but, I am pretty confident that both McCain and Palin had human mothers.  I am not so sure that Palin isn't "branded" though; that little minx could be into all kinds of kinky stuff.  Has anyone actually seen her bare-naked ass!
The final, and most probably the best definition for "maverick spirit," refers to the 1950's-60's television western series staring James Garner.  For those who weren't born yet or don't remember the show, James Garner plays a dapper dressed six-gun toting professional gambler who constantly gets himself into all sorts of wacky western high jinx.  Maverick (James Garner) always seemed to be completely oblivious of the extent of the dangers that he faced as he blundered his way through these adventures by flimflamming his numerous would-be adversaries.  Come on, if this doesn't perfectly describe McCain/Palin, I don't know what does!  
Who is the tall dark stranger there?
Maverick is the name.
Riding the trail to who-knows-where
Luck is his companion
Gamblin' is his game.
Smooth as the handle on a gun.
Maverick is the name.
Wild as the wind in Oregon
Blowin' up a canyon
Easier to tame.
Riverboat ring your bell.
Fare-thee-well Annabelle.
Luck is the lady that he loves the best.
Natchez to New Orleans.
Livin' on jacks and queens.
Maverick is a legend of the west.
After all, isn't McCain's proposed Presidential platform gambling with our futures, the economy, and the fate of our great nation.  I am just waiting for Sarah Palin to dawn one of those nineteenth-century bar girl outfits that Jodie Foster wore in the 1991 motion picture adaptation... meeeow!  So let us hear it for the "Maverick spirit."  

Obama is a Terrorist

It was confirmed today that Sen. Barack Obama is a terrorist.  So all you Americans out there that were trying to decide whether you should vote for the "black dude" can breathe your collective sighs of relief, and vote for the white team McCain/Palin ticket.  Yes, Obama's father is a Somalian Warlord, and was a "mole" planted in Chicago to destroy the American Dream.   The fact that McCain is just as likely to be some Manchurian Candidate himself is merely baseless conjecture!  Americans should also erase any thoughts that President Bush has acted as if he was programed by the Saudi royal family to act in complete opposition to the nations best interests, and aid in filling King Faud's pockets with more American money to fund global terrorism.
What can we do if Obama/Biden get elected?  Well... I know what can, and has been done.  All you Americans know it too.  Our country has done it before in '63; I naturally won't say it outright because I am sure that somewhere, a Carnivore computer program (or some carbon-based government agent) is monitoring this post in an attempt at deciding if I would make a good candidate for "patsy." We  Americans are going to elect McCain/Palin into the White house, so none of us have to contemplate a Junta anyway.
The nation can rest assured that we are going to put into the White house the very best individuals for the job.  After all, did anyone miss Palin emptying an entire magazine of 5.56N rounds down range; who can forget where they were when they first saw those luscious breasts rhythmically bouncing to that chorus of glorious gunfire!  I know I could only remember feeling that same way, when as a youth, I witnessed Sigourney Weaver (dressed in a similar tight-fitting tee shirt) take on those other alien bastards with her M-41A!  Oh... to be young and pubescent again! What red-blooded American voter could say that they didn't pop the proverbial "woody" watching that gubernatorial MILF busting a few caps off at the range.


So, if any of you heterosexual American men out there (and maybe some of you super-hot lesbians too) had any questions about what presidential ticket is better, just imagine Joe Biden in a sweat-soaked "wife-beater" tee shirt, fondling a red hot smoke wagon... yuck!  I got just two words for all you commie terrorist liberals out there- BOOBS!
It is up to all God-faring Americans to do the right thing this election year.  We must forget all the pertinent issues, and keep that black Muslim extremist out of the White house by voting for the McCain/Palin ticket!



Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Why The United States Doesn't Deserve Obama

The United States of America must elect Senator John McCain as the nation's next chief executive.  I will say that again, the US needs to elect McCain!  Our great nation deserves to elect another President who is completely out of touch with the needs of the average American.  The American people have never come to terms with the fact that we undeniably deserve every ill that has befallen us over the past 8 years.  From 9/11 to the market crash of the past several weeks, our nation should simply accept these calamities with a moronic grin on our collective faces proclaiming, "thank you sir... may I have another!" This is the bed that we must now lay in.  Not only did we get ourselves into this ridiculous position, but we gladly marched into it waving "Old Glory," and denouncing anyone who dared to question the direction this nation was heading.  
So whom is really to blame for our current situation?  It's not the corrupt politicians, nor the politics as usual "system" we have all recently been hearing about.  No, it is the average American; who is too stupid to read the newspaper, or pick up a magazine other than Hustler (example: Sarah Palinwatch). It is all the flag waving imbeciles who never served this country themselves, but were compelled to start a war in order to fulfill some twisted  Rambo inspired desire for the proverbial "pay-back!" The ugly American is not just what most other civilized nations think of us, it is the truest characterization of the American mentality.  We ignorantly blunder our way through the world bombastically grunting, and wildly swinging a club about; smashing our allies faces just as much as our enemy's.  Who can blame the average similarly ill-informed, and ignorant "terrorist" for wanting to do America harm?  Our own actions are creating more enemies, than we are eliminating.
Now we have the most important election since WWII, and what are we as concerned American voters focusing on?  We say it's the economy, but it's not!  We say it's national security, but it isn't that either.  I'll just come right out and say it... it is race!  I could understand that some Americans are still somewhat racist, and would choose the "white guy" if the choice was somehow even and if the only significant difference was color of the candidates skin.  But again, it isn't.  Clearly, Senator John McCain is so out of touch with the challenges this country faces, his candidacy would be laughable if the matter wasn't so incredibly serious!  Sen. John McCain is no hero... I will say that again, McCain is not an American Hero.  The fact that he served his country is indeed admirable.   However, I have served my country and am a decorated veteran, but that does not make me a hero either.  I know that someone reading this will say, "but he was a prisoner of war." The fact that McCain was a P.O.W in-and-of-itself does not make him a hero, it would have been his actions as a prisoner that would; if in fact he had acted honorably- which he did not.  While his prison-mates refused to denounce this country even under heinous torture, McCain repeatedly denounced the Vietnam War effort, and signed several statements criticising our country's involvement in south-east Asia.  The fact that John McCain broke-down under the pressure of intense and agonizing torture does not diminish his personal sacrifices or service to our great nation. However, it certainly does not give him the moral authority to question another man's patriotism either!
McCain is as corrupt a politician as they come.  He is neither a hero, nor a maverick.  His pockets are full of special interests money; let us not forget the Lincoln S & L scandals, and that he was implicated in the "Keating Five" debacle.  Even members of his own party question whether his is a crook.  http://www.slate.com/id/1004633/ 
So I pose this question the reader, "why is Obama not blowing McCain away in this election?" The answer is as obvious as the color of candidate's skin.  There is no other legitimate argument; if taken line for line, there is no question that Obama's policies are far better developed and realistic than those of John McCain.
There is another important difference that I will only briefly touch upon; mainly for that fact that there is really no room for debate.  The candidates choice for VP.  I am absolutely convinced that Americans are just plain stupid if they believe that Gov. Palin is up to the job of VP.  Not to mention if this buffoon, by some tragedy, became President.  The simple fact that she is on the ticket is evidence enough that McCain is completely out of touch with reality!  Gosh darn-it, don't even try to say that my opinion is based in some sexist desire not to see a woman as VP.  I am sure there are innumerable woman far more capable of performing the job of VP than Gov. Palin; and it seems that even many Republican would now agree.
In conclusion, I will make this statement, if the McCain/Palin ticket gets elected this November, then every catastrophe that will inevitably befall this nation of ours, we deserve.  Gosh Darn-it y'all... karma is a bitch!